- She is using a cell phone in a public space. The national security risks are overwhelming, plus the guy sitting behind her is clearly looking over her shoulder.
- The lady in the Gray in the back ground, wearing a gray jacket, can be seen to be on her cell phone -this is a clear security breach.
- The work files in front of her have not had all the material redacted.
- She is sitting in a aisle seat -when security protocols suggest she should never be seated, unless in a medical emergency – where the aisle seat will be utilized by the secret service of medical provider.
- Wearing dark glasses in a well lit room will simply draw attention to one self -at a time when discretion is paramount.
- She is wearing a Celtic broach, given to the high priest of the Sun. A high priest of the Sun would never wear matching ear rings, let alone coordinated bracelet and necklace. No women are allowed to worship the Sun, on pain of being burnt at the satke. Women are only allowed to worship the moon -for which they are allowed out of the kitchen.
- We have established that he individual sitting behind and to the left of Hillary is Alfonso Moralez. Moralez works as a counter clerk at the First Bank of the Philippines. The CEO of the First Bank of the Philippines has contributed over $3,000,000 to the Clinton foundation. This is a clear conflict of interest, especially since we have established that Moralez has voted for the Philippines Freedom Party who are advocating for the removal of US military bases in the Philippines. The fact that they both have the same yellow cloth situated by their right hands proves that they are indeed communicating.
Google Stupidparty and then Google GOP and you get a picture that says they are brothers – yes, from the same mother.
OK – so I cheated once – it should be easy to find.
Why does Ezra Kline demonstratesuch a typical (of the Media) cowardly stance on the topic he is discussing. Why can he not come out with the obvious conclusion one has to come to – assuming that his analogies were well chosen. Clue – if he really believes that this issue cuts across the political spectrum, then he would need a) better analogies and b) a slightly trickier Mathematical puzzle.
The ultimate irony is that Ezra Kline is more trapped than his ill chosen guinea pig – Sean Hannity.
The second half of the article talks more generally – but again the example cited focuses on the SP brain – in this case Justice Scalia, who is hardly a puzzle at all.
“Scalia is a highly ideological, tremendously intelligent individual with a very strong attachment to conservative politics. He’s the kind of identity-protector who has publicly said he stopped subscribing to the Washington Post because he “just couldn’t handle it anymore,” and so he now cocoons himself in the more congenial pages of the Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal. Isn’t it the case, I asked Kahan, that everything he’s found would predict that Scalia would convince himself of whatever he needed to think to get to the answers he wanted?
The question seemed to rattle Kahan a bit. “The conditions that make a person subject to that way of looking at the evidence,” he said slowly, “are things that should be viewed as really terrifying, threatening influences in American life. That’s what threatens the possibility of having democratic politics enlightened by evidence.”
The thread comes from the SP National Committee (RNC), a pretty mainstream SP organ – I believe it is discussing the Affordable Health Care act, or is it Obama’s Golf game, or is it something else? It really does not matter, insert any subject (i.e. try – I believe that Global warning is happening) and this is what you get.
Here is Galileo dropping two objects at the same time that have the same shape, but very different mass and weight – from the Leaning Tower of Pisa. Which ball will land first?
