The Republican Brain works Just like a Tree.
So we have just sat through 11 hours of Stupidparty prosecuting Hillary. Once again they showed their hand, and once again they literally had nothing. They were literally making stuff up with no coherent purpose other than to look good to the morons who voted for them. These are the Stupidparty reps handpicked by Boehner and able spend $5m -$20 and counting, to find ways to embarrass Hillary Clinton.
Then I got to thinking. How does a stupidparty disciple brain actually work –and when I say disciple, I am really thinking about the people who voted for these new seven pillars of stupidparty.
So let us start at the beginning. How did we get a brain in the first place and why do we even need one? I mean plenty of living organisms get by fine without a brain. Well there are two theories; either God gave us a brain or our brains evolved. If one accepts the first answer, then I would ask why would God be upset when Eve ate the apple –because if she had demurred, then why would one need a brain in the first place.
Now if we have a brain as a result of evolution – then the question would be why. Trees do not have brains. Did you know that there are three trillion trees on the planet?
An Alaska red cedar can live up to 3,500 years. Giant sequoias can last over 3,000 years and at least one Bristlecone pine is estimated to be almost 5,000 years old. If you look very carefully through this multi trillion haystack you may happen to come across one or two of the mere six billion human inhabitants who have an average life span of a mere 71 years.
So why is it that Trees do not need a brain? Well they have one big advantage – to thrive they do not need to move. They can drink all the nutrients they need through their roots, they can procreate by dropping seeds and letting the wind or other naturally occurring event, do all the heavy lifting. They can thrive by staying planted –not moving. I think that much can be said for most other brainless organisms–like bushes, flowers, vegetables fruits and weeds.
Now let us look at the words that tend to describe those people who are not Conservative. Independent means free to wander around in numerous directions. Liberal –means free to move around. Progressive — the need to get from Point A to Point B. Socialist—free to mingle, Communist —free to mingle as long as each person can mingle to precisely the same degree— and even Libertarian— freedom for the powerful to create a fascist society.
So that would leave us with our conservative friends. conservative means to conserve, to maintain the status quo (or an idealized historical version of it). conservatives have an overwhelming need to stay planted. They plant their roots in caves (with Fox news and or hate radio zones in the basements or in their cars). Why have passports, why travel outside their tribal forest –their three foot high intellectual horizon, can never peek above their self imposed canopy to see the sky. So they are planted –spoon fed, bible sacred bread, State is Red, easily led, early to bed, next to gun shed—brain dead.
So yes conservatives are born with a brain. Either God wanted them to have a brain for the purpose of using it , i.e. any such God has the same fundamental requirement as evolution – to use the brain to get nutrients (information) and procreate –outside of the tribe (healthy DNA). So however one actually got ones brains –the rule is, use it lose or lose it. An un exercised brain will atrophy and lead to thoughts so shallow that all one needs is a bumper sticker to be able to share them with totally disinterested strangers – as one listens to hate radio on a final trip to hell.
So why has this not always been a fairly obvious observation. The fact of the matter is that since the mid 1990’s the Stupidparty brain has shrunk by 50% -by a lack of use. How do we know this? Well here is just one example – take the selfish, cowardly, ill informed notion that having a gun makes you safer. The reverse is true – guns actually make the owner and every one they come into contact with less safe, the neighborhood less safe—but that is another story. Once you believe gundermentalist gibberish, it is only a short irrational leap to conclude that more than one gun will make you even safer. Perhaps twice as safe? So having established that – we can now understand the meaning of the below graphic.
Yup, they have gone and gotten themselves twice has stupid. I wonder how that happened?
Such leftist bullshit. First of all, how is Socialism in any form free to mingle? Do you not understand the concept of socialism? People work for the government, and the wealth is divided equally. Meaning any pathetic person with no motivation or work ethic could do half the work of you, and still get paid just as much as you. Second, you do realize the first thing any dictatorship or authoritarian party did was strip the citizens of their guns. Read a history book, Hitler banned all form of firearms before having his soldiers invade the personal privacy of every resident in Germany. Third, the top 10 highest homicidal countries have firearms completely banned. We don’t need to ban all weapons, we need to ban fully automatic rifles, and then require mental tests before allowing people to buy guns. Sane law-abiding citizens don’t buy guns to shoot up a school. People with mental issues do things like that. And lastly, before you honestly try saying that guns don’t make people safe, let me put this in perspective. If mentally capable citizens were allowed open carry, and some man walked into a movie theater with a rifle do you think he would get away with massacring all of them. No, because some responsible citizen can protect them. Open your eyes you leftist fuck. It’s not about pushing your views onto everyone it’s about finding a common ground that works without abolishing the constitution and the freedom our country has always stood on.
First what makes you think I am from the left? I just attack stupid people. Second your notion of socialism is half baked and infantile. Third your notion about working for the Government – what the hell are you talking about. The Army, the Police, the courts, teachers – just so many pathetic people. Yet their opposites, the Mercenaries, the private militias, for profit education – they are all so much better right? Your Hitler analogy is childish, the Gun issue was totally irrelevant to the fate of the Jews, and to the fate of German democracy in 1933 -More Guns make you less safe -this I prove on my website. If you choose to have a gun because you are fearful -then in the vast majority of cases you are a selfish ignorant coward, who because of you own inability to think critically are actually putting your self, your family and your community in greater danger. You have nothing to counter this fact. I am the one with the weapons on this issue -come at me -and I will take you down. Do not put words into my mouth, that is telling a lie -I have never ever endorsed banning anything in terms of Gun control -never. My opinions on the matter are irrelevant and so are yours. I do not do opinions – although on occasion i do do satire. So go find a statement that I have made on Guns that you disagree with. You can only complain about my simple and factual conclusion that a) More Guns= less safety b)The NRA is an insidious organisation by reviewing my actual analysis and finding a flaw in the argument. No intelligent person would argue using your dishonest and stupid technique i.e to put words in my mouth and then you make a non factual argument to rebut a point that I have never made. But between you and me -it would be a lot better for both of us -if neither of us was carrying a gun into the movies. There are several reasons for this a) you hate me – yet you do not know me or even understand what I have said b) I am probably not that great in a shoot out scenario -I have certainly never won any World of Warfare games c) although I was on a shooting team, I suspect my aim would be a bit wonky in a high adrenalin scenario, in the dark. But you Mr. Clint Eastwood -I some how doubt that I would make your day punk. You think that you are not crazy -but to my mind stupid people voting en mass results in a great deal of avoidable death and misery. I do not really blame you -but stupid people are guilty of manslaughter. Meet your peer group http://stupidpartyland.com/the-67
First I’ll say that we who are pro-gun control also want to keep guns out of the hands of those who are mentally ill. Now though I need to correct all the false statements you made. #1 Hitler never banned all forms of firearms in Germany, nor did he send anyone to invade every personal residence. The strict gun control laws in Germany were put in place before Hitler rose to power, he relaxed some laws and tightened some others, it all depended on who the person was and why they needed a firearm. #2 In the ten countries with the highest homicide rate guns aren’t banned at all, if you have a firearms license you can own, sell, and buy at your own discretion with other licensed owners. #3 Socialism does not mean that wealth is divided equally between participants. SSI is a good example, the amount people pay in FICA is the same percentage though differing amounts based on level of income, the amount they receive is the same percentage though differing amounts based on the amount they paid in. Two people of which one makes twice as much will pay a higher amount of FICA than the person who makes less, but both with pay the same percentage of income. When they receive SSI checks after retirement the one who paid more in FICA will receive a larger check than the one who paid less even though both are receiving the same percentage if they retired at the same age. #4 As for the values our country was founded on and the Constitution I’ll leave that up to an actual Founding Father … “To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”
—John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of the United States 475 (1787-1788)
Thanks for doing the heavy lifting I just did not have the time to debunk this Nazi Gun claptrap – that no serious historian would ever validate. That goes for Mao and Stalin. Mao had to overcome opposition that had plenty of Guns – and once he held sway -you put a foot wrong -bang you are dead. Owning a guns would do a penniless peasant absolutely no good, they were lucky to be own kindling wood. Owning a gun would only get them shot either by a Criminal who needed the gun to barter for food or more likely by the Red Army. Now imagine that they did have guns, and thought that the magnificent Seven would ride in and save the day. This is what would actually happen -the Red Army would roll in with their tanks and say “every one hand in your Guns” Now a peasant leader steps from his hut and says—no. Good bye Peasant, good bye Family, Good bye Hut – said the friendly little tank with a mighty roar of destruction. Now the tank asks does any one else have anything they would like to say. Oh Yes mighty tank, please, please take my Gun. I am really bored of people with an IQ of 50 bringing up historical events that they have no understanding about, and it is pointless engaging with the Zero substance voter.
I love the way you try to be logical but the Stupid Party members ALWAYS revert to name calling….No reply necessary…i don’t like being called names.
That is because they have no choice -since they have no substance. It is this total lack of substance that has been a revelation to me as I have undertaken this exercise. I have literally been begging for substance, for signs of intelligence -and yet it never materializes. I am genuinely stunned. I can only conclude that the Stupidparty is driven by ignorance, bigotry and hate.
Talk about stupid: Red states pay less in taxes but suck more money from the combined taxes of all states aka the taxes Blue states pay into the USGOV. Red states have MORE uneducated, unemployed, welfare dependent citizens than Blue states. RED STATES ARE SOCIALIST STATES!!!!!
You got it.
I am not going to respond to your various rants. If you see an error in a blog feel free to point it out. I will correct any such errors. I am not interested in your opinions. I do not do opinions. You are still talking crap about socialism, so let me give you a clue or a way for you to be taken seriously -name one “socialist” Country, explain why it is rotten and then I might engage. By the way their are countries that you could name and that I will have no problem considering them as less than desirable