ALL THE FACTS THAT ARE FIT TO PRINT:
A new type of news source that eschews opinions, skewers stupidity, lights a fuse under bigotry.
As this website takes a short break, bracing ourselves for perhaps the most crucial election to date -the stakes getting unprecedentedly greater as the country plummets ever deeper into intellectual lunacy, a paradigm were facts lose to myth, to lies,to falsehoods and misinformation -we must all work to promote the truth. We will bring you the news that other media struggle to get a grip on. Because of our math based approach, we often report trends, inevitable events -even before they happen, or explain events very rapidly as we utilize our data base to explain what has happened, and why it has happened.
For any one who feels oppressed by trying to beat a dead horse, we will provide all the tools in easily accessible format for such principled individuals to win every battle with Stupidparty family friends and acquaintances. We can make our readers like Neo (in the matrix)—able to stop incoming bullets with one hand – and then dive into the belly of the beast. We will design tools – to make this effortless, so that you no longer need to expend energy refuting nonsense, and you can devote time to helping in more productive ways than arguing with idiots. If you know any Stupidparty disciples, any “independents” and worst of all those people who fall for false equivalence – we will be here and some time in early 2016 we will provide guidelines, sign posts and strategies to make you immortal.
This is the year when we must begin to salvage our Democracy, this is the year when we must ensure that Facts and Math overwhelm Myths an Lies. At the end of the day -that is what the media should be doing- but they are failing miserably
We are a news source committed to salvaging American democracy and assisting humanity.
No you are not entitled to your opinion! Not when confronted with facts proving you wrong. Media needs to evolve from the desiccated environment it helped to create. Why do you think we are suffering the insufferable amount of claptrap, posing as “news”? Why are people allowed to get away with believing that more guns makes every one safer, that the climate is not warming, that Jesus was a misogynist. The prideful, parochial confederate flag has become more of a symbol of hate than ever.
If you are confused by the USA’s descent into vacuous opinion, posing as a counter argument to facts – this website will provide you with all the facts that will allow you to easily eviscerate the Stupid. We can no longer afford to tolerate false equivalence, meaningless slogans. Myths will be mercilessly exposed. There can be no counter argument – as we prove with the majority of the news stories that we cover, every chapter we write. We will usually try and bring humor to offset the pain, the plain facts dominating again, will be easily accessible, nuanced subjects broken down in to easy to absorb component parts.
Only by truly understanding the facts – do obvious solutions naturally emerge. We avoid spelling out such solutions, understanding that once you read the news as it should be presented, the reader should have little problem in figuring out what the solutions are. An exception to this guiding principle would be our “Smartparty” platform where in we spell out the six simple fixes that would allow the people to take back their democracy and their economic destiny. We are non partisan — deep down 80% of Americans would agree with the bulk of our Smartparty platform, close to 100% of Americans would be not able to find significant flaws in the mathematically sound logic that is the back bone of our endeavors. Guest contributors will get more latitude. We let facts, numbers, truths, scientists, experts do the talking. We do not tolerate faux Christians, birther’s, science deniers, purveyors of myth, tools of paid off research, carriers of ignorance and hate. Confronted with such – we will not be kind or forgiving. They will be destroyed.
Yes – non partisan, we do not take sides, endorse candidates. We let the reader figure out which candidate is most likely to bring us closer to the six key reforms – considering all the complex strategies involved in trying to get us closer to that vital goal – before our corrupted democracy becomes totally controlled by the whims of the top .01% of society.
The end times might well be nigh. We can not prevent an asteroid, a massive volcano. If technological singularity were to occur, it would be totally logical for the computers to ravage mankind, because mankind’s myopic stupidity is the major threat to all living organisms. Rest assured, the end times will not be presaged by four horses galloping down main street – it will far more likely to be presaged by the self fulfilling actions of myopic stupidity, bigotry and superstition.
And I saw, and behold a white horse. And he that sat on him had calculated that he would forever be a ruler and would set forth and conquer myth with the use of math.
And there went out another horse, that was red. And power was given to him that sat thereon to take science to mankind, and that he must prevent raging winds, hell’s furnace, and plagues by allowing research to inoculate against witchcraft.
And I beheld, and lo a black horse. And he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. On one side sat facts and on the other untruths, and never again would the two be held equivalent.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse. And his name that sat on him was knowledge, and ignorance followed behind. And as the power of math, science, and facts was given to knowledge, so he trampled over ignorance, and deep into the earth this conquered beast did disperse.
Inspired by the Book of Revelations, the last book of the New Testament
We are also looking for an interaction with our readers. Comments, feedback, guest writer content. With this interaction can come mutual support and as such we can all become a louder voice. Please consider the following actions:
Sign up to our Smartparty Agenda (US Citizens)
Sign up to our Newsletter -(sign up can be found under the poll) to stay up to date.
Follow us on and be part of our Twitter Community
Follow us and be part of our Facebook Community.
If you really like any particular posting, comment or tweet—please share with your network. This is particularly important for our Smartparty agenda, if you agree that this platform would be a big help for the USA, then please share this with your social media network -but most importantly with your true friends.
There isn’t much to be said as it appears that this is an introduction to your site. However, I am excited to see what come of it.
Hello there, I stumbled upon your internet site by means of Yahoo though trying to find a similar issue, your website showed up, it looks just like beneficial. I have put into favourites features and functions|included in our favorites.. Child (Literature Subject)
Well, I can see that you are already discrediting yourselves. You ARE taking sides by singling out those that you claim to be “faux christians”. Thousands of Gods are believed in on this planet, but only the one that the “christians” believe in is real? Also, you make mention of guns, and you say “Why are people allowed to get away with believing that more guns makes everyone safer?” Facts are facts. Look at the government’s own statistics and compare them to actual independent study numbers, and you will find that violent crime has gone down for many years, while gun ownership has skyrocketed. If this isn’t a case of “MATH VS. MYTH” then, I don’t know what is! Truth indeed.
Also…I would be surprised if this comment receives moderator approval.
Of course you will get approved -you tried, you failed – and by doing so you are the perfect illustration, the raison d’etre behind this news site. So thank you.
This is something that your massively small mind cannot seem to comprehend – a fact is a fact. I post factual content. Now if I have made a factual error I will always own up to it and correct it. Therefore if you have a complaint, instead of posting pointless opinions all you have to do is find an error. I will give you an example of how to fact check. Imagine someone said that Obama was born in Kenya. What you need to do is find two corroborating sources from professional Journalism cites that state the fact that Obama has a birth certificate from Hawaii and that such birth was confirmed at the time in local Hawaiian newspapers. That is how you get a fact. How do you avoid talking utter nonsense – well you do not use any source even remotely connected to Roger Aisles – because that he how idiots like yourself become idiots. Idiots that have no clue about fact checking or about academia. So here is a piece directly pertinent to your ignorance -your mission, which you will not be up to, is to find a factual error http://stupidpartyland.com/1/post/2016/07/worlds-worst-weasel-mortally-wounded-talk-hand.html get cracking!
Nothing you have said about religion is pertinent to any thing that I have said about religion. Regarding Guns -you prove yourself to be moron by promoting the infantile more “Guns lead to less violent crime” meme -which I disprove in fashion that someone with a mental age of 5 can comprehend here..http://stupidpartyland.com/1/post/2015/05/attacking-the-heart-of-gundamentalism-its-rock-star-pseudo-mathmatician.html . The fact they you fall for such a simple correlation = causation trap, illustrates why people like you are not entitled to your own opinions, such opinions lead to more deaths, making you guilty of manslaughter by stupidity.
That article that you link to disproves nothing! What it does do, is prove just how far “off kilter” that you actually lean. Anyone can throw together a bunch of pointless numbers and words from Mother Jones and wikipedia (which isn’t even citable academically) and call them facts. You certainly do have your math and myths confused.
It is not simply an article -I wrote it, it is all fact checked, and yet you can not find any errors in the facts. So read it properly and educate yourself -and then let us see if you have anything remotely intelligent to say. In the mean time – since you are are actively refusing to acknowledge some very simple facts, having been exposed to such facts -it means that your crimes against humanity can no longer be parsed as simply “ignorance is bliss.” Facts hurt -absorb the pain and try and become a decent member of humanity – or forever be doomed to stay within your pathetic peer group.http://stupidpartyland.com/the-67
My biggest problem with your site is that you spend too much time on retards. Other than that, not bad.
I guess that is the point -we are simply trying to remove stupid from the political debate -because you can not have a debate when one side has no substance, no intellect.
Actually, it can be cited – that’s why it has footnotes you dolt.
If you do not know how to debate please do not waste my time. Simply find an incorrect fact
What a bunch of shit! You just moderate out any comments that don’t jibe with your own and prove you to be wrong.
Yes I did, you were saying nothing, taking oxygen out of the room -I explained to you about how to fact check and you were not able to respond intelligently. I am perfectly familiar with the pro’s and con’s of Wikipedia, I do not need to debate the issue with a one trick pony. I use a diverse sources of credible sites, if i did not then people would complain about lack of diversity. Wikipedia is sometimes used as a launching pad, may be 5% of the total citations max and virtually every such detail would have a citation, it has no partisan bias that I am aware of, but of course it is not the be all and and end all and one needs to be careful – If I always used the NYT, Forbes etc I would be accused of a liberal bias (even though facts clearly have a liberal bias, so anyone focusing on facts will be accused of a liberal bias) – but I do not label myself as liberal. Only people who can not rebut the facts accuse of that and much much worse – for they have nothing. It is very easy to figure out which cites to avoid -e.g. anything with Roger Ailes finger print or shadow, hate radio -and studies have proven that people who listen to those sources are less informed than people who pay no attention to the news. That would explain the Trump nomination – a man who can only attract low information voters ( to put it politely). But here is what you were not capable of understanding – that a fact by definition can be verified. So if you are going to accuse me of providing bad info you should find no difficulty in proving any erroneous fact wrong. Yes I got bored debating with you because you had nothing but a circular argument and you were being intellectually dishonest. If you have anything intelligent to say I am happy to debate. If any one points out an error , I own up to it and correct it. How difficult is that?
Just post the truth, that Wikipedia is NOT acceptable as a credible source. Then, make a public statement as such and admit that you (and your “followers”) were wrong in using opinion and making such a claim. Only then will you begin to regain some credibility. Otherwise…..BULLSHIT!!! Talk about “intellectual dishonesty” and having to “expend energy refuting nonsense”. I am sure that you won’t make such a statement. Hell, I am even quite sure that you won’t even approve this comment and just “moderate it right out of the equation of your “math”!
I will post your comment but it does prove that you are a total waste of space, a one trick pony and totally dishonest and just extraordinarily stupid – too stupid to actually bother to find an incorrect fact, incapable of understanding and countering any content that I provide. So as this response will confirm, talking to a mental midget like you , who can not be bothered to actually absorb what I write is just such a total waste of time – so yes if you keep saying stupid things I will not carry on posting your garbage. You are now officially warned. I keep begging Stupidparty disciples to say something intelligent but they never can. You are not entitled to your opinion if I can prove it wrong- you are what is wrong with Politics today, you are why we have Trump attempting to become President of the USA. Since becoming an author and having worked with top lawyers in the area of slander etc I did learn that in politics, that some quotes commonly attributed to politicians are not factual. If a quote from a politician sounds too awful to be true, then on occasion such quotes are invented or misquoted. In this situation you cannot rely on any one source – you need to find two credible sources (i.e. well known professional Journalist cites who would fire journalists for making such mistakes, with the exact quote. When I and others professionals were fact checking my first book (draft version) we probably found about ten out of thousands of quotes that I had to withdraw, clarify or replace before publication -but i have become a better fact checker since
-so here are the facts about Wikipedia: When you Google the question “How accurate is Wikipedia?” the highest-ranking result is, as you might expect, a Wikipedia article on the topic (“Reliability of Wikipedia”).
That page contains a comprehensive list of studies undertaken to assess the accuracy of the crowd-sourced encyclopedia since its founding 10 years ago. Of course, if you find yourself on this page, you might worry that the list itself may not be trustworthy. Well, the good news is that almost all those studies tell us that it probably is. In 2005, the peer-reviewed journal Nature asked scientists to compare Wikipedia’s scientific articles to those in Encyclopaedia Britannica—”the most scholarly of encyclopedias,” according to its own Wiki page. The comparison resulted in a tie; both references contained four serious errors among the 42 articles analyzed by experts.And last year, a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that Wikipedia had the same level of accuracy and depth in its articles about 10 types of cancer as the Physician Data Query, a professionally edited database maintained by the National Cancer Institute.The self-described “free encyclopedia that anyone can edit” has fared similarly well in most other studies comparing its accuracy to conventional encyclopedias, including studies by The Guardian, PC Pro, Library Journal, the Canadian Library Association, and several peer-reviewed academic studies.
Actually, I am entitled to my opinion. The 1st Amendment says so.
Only a Trumpeteer would be happy to hold an opinion that is provably wrong.
We’re entitled to our opinions because 1. One cannot directly control what someone believes and 2. Simply holding an opinion is not a violation of anyone’s rights.
Holding moronic opinions like guns make people safer (generally speaking in America) or a pro life agenda reduces abortions or is even a Christian value, means that people will die – you do not have the right to hold a deadly stupid opinions ( e.g. in your opinion gassing Jews is a good idea) – not when facts prove you wrong (genocide leads to more genocide) not when you accept the responsibility inherent in wanting to participate a in democracy-not a round me you don’t. People who threaten the human race are simply unacceptable. If your opinion becomes indefensible it is better for every one, including your self, that you stay in your cave. Now if you believe that fascism is better than democracy -then come right out of the closet and say it and make your case (the ancient Greeks had endless debates about the merits of democracy). But when all you can say is that you have the right to publicize your opinion -what it tells me is that you have reached the end of your intellectual horizon. At that point you have nothing to offer so STFU —I dislike wasting my time debating morons